Important Disclaimer: Ken Kam, Marketocracy Data Research's Editor in Chief, also is portfolio manager for mutual and hedge funds advised by a Marketocracy affiliate. Before relying on his opinions, always assume that he, Marketocracy, its affiliates and clients have material financial interests in these stocks and hold or trade them contrary to those opinions. Continue reading for more detailed and important disclosures, disclaimers, limitations and material conflicts of interest.

Continue reading "Disclaimer" »

May 05, 2008

Where are all the great investors?

graph of fund vs. market indexes
BIPm100 S&P 500 DJIA Nasdaq

We all dream of finding the next Warren Buffet. But even Warren Buffet is having trouble finding the next Warren Buffet. And, he’s not the only one having trouble. Out of over 11,000 mutual funds, almost 70% have replaced their managers in the last 5 years. That’s a pretty high failure rate. The scarcity of investment talent is the perhaps the single biggest reason why there are so few mutual funds that I found worth recommending as a core holding.  Click here for the list

Actually, there is a good reason why there are so few great investors. When it comes to investing,  mistakes can cost thousands of dollars. Since everyone is bound to make mistakes when they are getting started, it is hard to get enough practice to become a great investor without going broke in the process. If the same was true of golf, there would be just as few great golfers as there are great investors.

Continue reading (with subscription) "Where are all the great investors?" »

April 24, 2008

Learning from Mark Twain

Mark Twain once said that its not what you know that gets you in trouble, its what you think you know for sure that ain’t so. In my experience, when it comes to investing, Mark Twain was absolutely right. I’ve spent a lot of time trying to unlearn things I was sure of that just ain’t so.

Recently I ran across an article that repeated a story that concludes that you cannot tell anything about an investor's future performance from his past track record. I first heard this story over 20 years ago, and to tell the truth, I was once so convinced by it that for a good part of my youth I kept my core equity portfolio almost entirely in index funds.

The author of the article asked readers to imagine a stadium full of people ready to flip a coin. After each coin-toss, those who throw tails are asked to leave. At the end of 10 coin-tosses, there is one person left who has the exceptional track record of throwing heads 10 times in a row. Now, the author asks, would you bet on this person to do better than average in the next 10 coin-tosses? Of course not.

Continue reading (with subscription) "Learning from Mark Twain" »

March 11, 2008

The banks aren't bouncing right back

In the last three months, I’ve come to the conclusion that the credit crunch is one of those rare events that is significant enough to change our long-term outlook and investment strategy.  Here’s why.

Banks used to give loans only to people they believed would pay them back. This was the business model of every bank -- until the securitized loan business invented a new school of go-go banking.

It's that business that has broken down.

For banks, the securitized loan business model offered two big advantages. Since the loans were packaged and sold to investors, the quantity of loans a bank could make was not limited by its capital. And the bank was off the hook if a loan wasn’t repaid.

The profits generated from securitizing loans made a big contribution to earnings growth in the financial sector. And therein lies the problem for stocks. The shutdown of the securitized loan industry is going to take a big chunk out of the earnings of Washington Mutual (W),  Citibank (C), Merrill Lynch (MER), Bear Stearns (BSC) and other names that were the leaders in securitizing loans.

Investors might be able to look past the big subprime mortgage write-offs if they believed the banks’ problems were behind them, because in the end, market prices reflect future earnings. But without a source of earnings to replace the profits that used to come from securitizing loans, it will be difficult for the financial sector to sustain a rally.

So although the financials have taken a beating, I am not at all tempted to bottom-fish the sector because I don’t see how earnings can recover. Further interest-rate cuts will not restore the securitized loan industry, so if earnings are to recover, they are going to have to come from something else that I don’t see right now.

Continue reading (with subscription) "The banks aren't bouncing right back" »

[marketocracy]
Marketocracy Rules | Privacy Statement | Services Agreement | Questions

Copyright © 2001-2008. Marketocracy. All rights reserved
Marketocracy, the Marketocracy logo and m100 are service marks of Marketocracy, Inc.
Patents Pending

All quotes delayed 20 minutes